Michigan Judicial Corruption - The Circuit Court Affair

Michigan’s Family Laws from the initial filing for divorce to child support enforcement is nothing short of unconstitutional.  Note the following:

  1. Before the State, any State, can interfere in the rights of parents, married, divorcing, or divorced, the court must find that the parent is: Unwilling, Unable, or Unfit to parent. Period.  See U.S. Supreme Courts’ ruing in the case of In Re Troxel republished in this website.  Michigan Circuit courts violate this right every day.
  2. Then after violating a parent’s right (typically the fathers’) to directly support their children they order child support under Michigan’s child collateralise support scheme. Michigan receives exorbitant amounts of federal block grants under Title 4 D for doing so.
  3. In violation of [ name of federal statute ] Michigan circuit courts discriminates by gender at a rate of 9:1
  4. There are victims of Michigan’s corruption that allege evidence was doctored up to support the circuit courts’ agenda.
  5. The State, any State, when interfering in a parents right must do so in the least obtrusive way. Not in Michigan.
  6. One argument Michigan makes is that divorcing parents argue so joint custody – equal parenting time / direct support just doesn’t work as it harms the children exposed to the arguing. That is a another one of Michigan’s lies.  Transfer facilities wherein the parents drop off their children for the other parent to pick them up have long been available.  One parent picking up the children from school on Friday and dropping them off at school on Monday is another system that keeps parents that insist on arguing apart.  But the State doesn’t make any Federal Block grants for those systems.
  7. Then there is the criminal child support statute MCL § 750.165 for those that cannot or refuse to pay after all of Michigan’s violations of their fundamental fundamental rights. (See the links below to each of those constitutional violations).
  8. MCL § 750.165 treats failure to pay as a heinous crime, which under the  Federal constitution and rulings is a prison sentence, or a prison sentence of 1 year or more (See the Congressional [ Name (LINK)].  As such no one can be arrested without a Grand Jury investigation and indictment.  Michigan routinely ignores this constitutional requirements making most if not all “convictions” under MCL § 750.165 void or voidable. 
  9. The Michigan Attorney General’s office, has in the past, routinely arrested out-of-state defendants that hadn’t committed a crime in the State of Michigan. And the judges at the circuit courts have routinely rubber stamped the arrest and proceeded with hearings they knew they had no authority to hold (the first duty of the trial court is to rule whether or not it has jurisdiction over the defendant).  If the court does not then everything following that failure is void. . . .  Without “In Personam Jurisdiction”  the court can hold any proceedings, cannot hold the defendant, accept a plea agreement, nor rule that the defendant is guilty of breaking the law and enter a conviction.

These are the most recent updates to each Pleading / Argument.  You can view each pdf file by clicking on the thumbnail image.

Unconstitutional as: Cruel & Unusual Punishment, Debtor's Prison, and Excessive Bail

This section covers the three facets of the Michigan criminal code MCL § 750.165.  Each facet of the code (Punishment, Prison Term, and Bail) are in violation of the Michigan and U.S. Constitutions.  The statute and anyone’s  “conviction” are therefore unconstitutional and lawless.

Cruel and Unusual Punishment Habeas Petition
Cruel and Unusual Punishment Habeas Petition
Debtors Prison Habeas Petition
Debtors Prison Habeas Petition
Excessive Bail Habeas Petition
Excessive Bail Habeas Petition

I sincerely hope these are helpful in developing a further understanding of just how unconstitutional Michigan’s felony statute MCL § 750.165 is.  As well as how morally bankrupt the Michigan judiciary is that has utterly failed in their duty to review and declare this depraved statute to be unconstitutional. 

All the best!

Copyright 2014-2021 Deerings-Paralegal.com

All materials, products, and services provided on this website are the property of Deerings-Paralegal.com, its affiliates, directors, officers, agents, suppliers, and/or licensors including all copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, patents, and other intellectual property. By using this weblite you agree that you will not reproduce or redistribute Deerings-Paralegal.com’s intellectual property in any manner, including electronic, digital, or new trademark registrations without properly crediting Deerings-Paralegal.com  siting the source and its url.

You grant Deerings-Paralegal.com a royalty-free and non-exclusive license to display, use, copy, transmit, and broadcast the content you upload and publish.

 

As a user of this website, you may be asked to register with us and provide private information. You are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of this information, and you are responsible for maintaining the safety and security of your identifying details. You are also responsible for all activities that occur under your account or password.

 If you think there are any possible issues regarding the security of your account on the website, inform us immediately so we may address it accordingly.

 We reserve all rights to terminate accounts, edit or remove content and cancel orders in our sole discretion.

 

Deering's Paralegal